<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Tale of Build Numbers and Deployment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pburch.com/blog/2010/03/05/a-tale-of-build-numbers-and-deployment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pburch.com/blog/2010/03/05/a-tale-of-build-numbers-and-deployment/</link>
	<description>Tales from the Datacenter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:36:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://www.pburch.com/blog/2010/03/05/a-tale-of-build-numbers-and-deployment/comment-page-1/#comment-863</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pburch.com/blog/2010/03/05/a-tale-of-build-numbers-and-deployment/#comment-863</guid>
		<description>addendum zu previous post:

after installing the network drivers manually via USB stick, I logged off and on again as ADMINISTRATOR and the deployment wizard continued where halted. Nice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>addendum zu previous post:</p>
<p>after installing the network drivers manually via USB stick, I logged off and on again as ADMINISTRATOR and the deployment wizard continued where halted. Nice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://www.pburch.com/blog/2010/03/05/a-tale-of-build-numbers-and-deployment/comment-page-1/#comment-862</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pburch.com/blog/2010/03/05/a-tale-of-build-numbers-and-deployment/#comment-862</guid>
		<description>update:
I followed the youtube tutorial of MS-tech specialist Jay Paloma and came to the problem in this thread.
I NOW got it running and want to say that 
&gt;&gt;&gt; it is NOT dependant on the Build numbers !!! &lt;&lt;&lt;

The problem with &quot;SETUP NOT FOUND&quot; came from the steps in MDT, while importing the WIM into MDT.

-In MDT: you go left pane to OPERATING SYSTEMS.
-Right mouseclick &quot;IMPORT&quot;.
-Next you are asked what OS TYPE to import.
-You select CUSTOM IMAGE FILE and select your WIM
you have captured.
-on NEXT you come to the crucial point that was wrong described. You select the second entry &quot;Copy Windows Vista, Win server 2003 or later setup files from specific path&quot;
-You select the earlier imported original Windows-installation-CD as Source for the SETUP files. (should be no WIM but all files in a subfolder)

NOW, your captured custom WIM is beeing imported in MDT and the Setup files are added from the original installation medium.

It was no problem for me.
(well exept missing network drivers on one desktop PC, so the BDD-autorun Script refused to continue under Win7)

Hope this helped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>update:<br />
I followed the youtube tutorial of MS-tech specialist Jay Paloma and came to the problem in this thread.<br />
I NOW got it running and want to say that<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; it is NOT dependant on the Build numbers !!! &lt;&lt;&lt;</p>
<p>The problem with &quot;SETUP NOT FOUND&quot; came from the steps in MDT, while importing the WIM into MDT.</p>
<p>-In MDT: you go left pane to OPERATING SYSTEMS.<br />
-Right mouseclick &quot;IMPORT&quot;.<br />
-Next you are asked what OS TYPE to import.<br />
-You select CUSTOM IMAGE FILE and select your WIM<br />
you have captured.<br />
-on NEXT you come to the crucial point that was wrong described. You select the second entry &quot;Copy Windows Vista, Win server 2003 or later setup files from specific path&quot;<br />
-You select the earlier imported original Windows-installation-CD as Source for the SETUP files. (should be no WIM but all files in a subfolder)</p>
<p>NOW, your captured custom WIM is beeing imported in MDT and the Setup files are added from the original installation medium.</p>
<p>It was no problem for me.<br />
(well exept missing network drivers on one desktop PC, so the BDD-autorun Script refused to continue under Win7)</p>
<p>Hope this helped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://www.pburch.com/blog/2010/03/05/a-tale-of-build-numbers-and-deployment/comment-page-1/#comment-859</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pburch.com/blog/2010/03/05/a-tale-of-build-numbers-and-deployment/#comment-859</guid>
		<description>update:

after UPGRADE sysprep could not be started in an upgraded environment.
So I have to install from scratch. d*mn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>update:</p>
<p>after UPGRADE sysprep could not be started in an upgraded environment.<br />
So I have to install from scratch. d*mn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://www.pburch.com/blog/2010/03/05/a-tale-of-build-numbers-and-deployment/comment-page-1/#comment-858</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pburch.com/blog/2010/03/05/a-tale-of-build-numbers-and-deployment/#comment-858</guid>
		<description>update:
I run Win7 on the different version number (7600.16539)
I ran the setup under the system and chose &quot;Upgrade&quot;
The Version number is now restored to it&#039;s source version (7600.16385)
I keep you posted if deployment works now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>update:<br />
I run Win7 on the different version number (7600.16539)<br />
I ran the setup under the system and chose &#8220;Upgrade&#8221;<br />
The Version number is now restored to it&#8217;s source version (7600.16385)<br />
I keep you posted if deployment works now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://www.pburch.com/blog/2010/03/05/a-tale-of-build-numbers-and-deployment/comment-page-1/#comment-857</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pburch.com/blog/2010/03/05/a-tale-of-build-numbers-and-deployment/#comment-857</guid>
		<description>is there a &quot;dirty&quot; way to change the build/lab number in Win7 so the installer thinks it&#039;s the old version?
I already tried to alter the registry but it jumps back after rebooting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is there a &#8220;dirty&#8221; way to change the build/lab number in Win7 so the installer thinks it&#8217;s the old version?<br />
I already tried to alter the registry but it jumps back after rebooting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://www.pburch.com/blog/2010/03/05/a-tale-of-build-numbers-and-deployment/comment-page-1/#comment-856</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pburch.com/blog/2010/03/05/a-tale-of-build-numbers-and-deployment/#comment-856</guid>
		<description>strangely there is no KB977165 installation in the installed software overview :-/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>strangely there is no KB977165 installation in the installed software overview :-/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://www.pburch.com/blog/2010/03/05/a-tale-of-build-numbers-and-deployment/comment-page-1/#comment-855</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pburch.com/blog/2010/03/05/a-tale-of-build-numbers-and-deployment/#comment-855</guid>
		<description>imho you can include the patch via MDT. The base WIM is not beeing affected.
The patch will be included after installation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>imho you can include the patch via MDT. The base WIM is not beeing affected.<br />
The patch will be included after installation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.pburch.com/blog/2010/03/05/a-tale-of-build-numbers-and-deployment/comment-page-1/#comment-834</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 01:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pburch.com/blog/2010/03/05/a-tale-of-build-numbers-and-deployment/#comment-834</guid>
		<description>Not that I know of.  I think we&#039;re going to have to wait for a service pack so Microsoft will update the DVD and the source wims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that I know of.  I think we&#8217;re going to have to wait for a service pack so Microsoft will update the DVD and the source wims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.pburch.com/blog/2010/03/05/a-tale-of-build-numbers-and-deployment/comment-page-1/#comment-833</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 23:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pburch.com/blog/2010/03/05/a-tale-of-build-numbers-and-deployment/#comment-833</guid>
		<description>I just came across the same problem with the build numbers not matching and getting the error &quot;unable to find setup&quot;. Is there a way to include the updated source files in MDT so I don&#039;t have to worry about excluding MS10-015 before capturing?
Thanks, Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just came across the same problem with the build numbers not matching and getting the error &#8220;unable to find setup&#8221;. Is there a way to include the updated source files in MDT so I don&#8217;t have to worry about excluding MS10-015 before capturing?<br />
Thanks, Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.pburch.com/blog/2010/03/05/a-tale-of-build-numbers-and-deployment/comment-page-1/#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 19:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pburch.com/blog/2010/03/05/a-tale-of-build-numbers-and-deployment/#comment-832</guid>
		<description>Just an FYI, people who use fat images, and pre-install windows updates to the wim will be unable to deploy an image that has been captured after installing MS10-015 - KB977165.  This update modifies the kernel version number, and ZTI will fail saying it can not find setup files for deployment.

More information on MS10-015 - KB977165:

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/977165/

I would say its best to install this update after deployment if this is the route you go.

-Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just an FYI, people who use fat images, and pre-install windows updates to the wim will be unable to deploy an image that has been captured after installing MS10-015 &#8211; KB977165.  This update modifies the kernel version number, and ZTI will fail saying it can not find setup files for deployment.</p>
<p>More information on MS10-015 &#8211; KB977165:</p>
<p><a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/977165/" rel="nofollow">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/977165/</a></p>
<p>I would say its best to install this update after deployment if this is the route you go.</p>
<p>-Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
