<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tales from the Datacenter &#187; App-V</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pburch.com/blog/category/app-v/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pburch.com/blog</link>
	<description>Tales from the Datacenter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:51:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Configuring Existing App-V Sequences for the 4.6 Client Beta</title>
		<link>http://www.pburch.com/blog/2009/08/10/configuring-existing-app-v-sequences-for-the-4-6-client-beta/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pburch.com/blog/2009/08/10/configuring-existing-app-v-sequences-for-the-4-6-client-beta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[App-V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app-v 4.6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public beta app-v 4.6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pburch.com/blog/2009/08/10/configuring-existing-app-v-sequences-for-the-4-6-client-beta/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ve seen a lot of buzz lately on the release of the App-V 4.6 Public Beta.  Of course, I downloaded the new 4.6 clients because the most exciting feature (to me) in it is support for 64-bit App-V clients. The second most exciting feature (to me) is the support for packages sequenced with 4.5 to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve seen a lot of buzz lately on the <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/mdop/archive/2009/07/30/app-v-4-6-public-beta-now-available-for-download.aspx">release of the App-V 4.6 Public Beta</a>.  Of course, I downloaded the new 4.6 clients because the most exciting feature (to me) in it is support for 64-bit App-V clients.</p>
<p>The second most exciting feature (to me) is the support for packages sequenced with 4.5 to be played on 4.6 clients (even the x64 client!).  The problem I had this morning, though, was there are a ton of blogs touting this support, but no one bothered to publish <em>how</em>.  For instance, from <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/softgrid/archive/2009/08/06/understanding-the-different-mixes-of-32-bit-and-64-bit-applications-and-platform-supported.aspx">The App-V Team Blog</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>All your pre-4.6 packages are valid and can continue to be used on the 4.6 client – just modify the OSD file to include the OS values for the 32 and/or 64-bit platform as target, as appropriate.</p></blockquote>
<p>So, it can be done, but how do I include support for Windows 7 x64 clients in the OSD?  Like this:</p>
<p>Your current OSD files have a section that includes something similar to the following:</p>
<blockquote><p>&lt;OS VALUE=”WinXP”/&gt;<br />
&lt;OS VALUE=&#8221;Win7&#8243;/&gt;</p></blockquote>
<p>This indicates that the package is available for all Windows XP and Windows 7 clients (32-bit of course, because version 4.5 does not support 64-bit).  So, add the following to your OSD file under the last “OS VALUE” entry to enable support for Windows 7 x64:</p>
<blockquote><p>&lt;OS VALUE=&#8221;Win764&#8243;/&gt;</p></blockquote>
<p>And here&#8217;s a list of all the available target operating systems:</p>
<blockquote><p><span id="ctl00_MasterBody_ArticleBodyPanelBodyLabel">&lt;OS VALUE=&#8221;Win2003TS&#8221;/&gt;<br />
&lt;OS VALUE=&#8221;Win2003TS64&#8243;/&gt;<br />
&lt;OS VALUE=&#8221;Win2008R2TS64&#8243;/&gt;<br />
&lt;OS VALUE=&#8221;Win2008TS&#8221;/&gt;<br />
&lt;OS VALUE=&#8221;Win2008TS64&#8243;/&gt;<br />
&lt;OS VALUE=&#8221;Win7&#8243;/&gt;<br />
&lt;OS VALUE=&#8221;Win764&#8243;/&gt;<br />
&lt;OS VALUE=&#8221;WinVista&#8221;/&gt;<br />
&lt;OS VALUE=&#8221;WinVista64&#8243;/&gt;<br />
&lt;OS VALUE=&#8221;WinXP&#8221;/&gt;<br />
&lt;OS VALUE=&#8221;WinXP64&#8243;/&gt;</span></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pburch.com/blog/2009/08/10/configuring-existing-app-v-sequences-for-the-4-6-client-beta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Refreshing App-V Publishing Server</title>
		<link>http://www.pburch.com/blog/2009/06/15/refreshing-app-v-publishing-server/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pburch.com/blog/2009/06/15/refreshing-app-v-publishing-server/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[App-V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app-v client]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app-v client console]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[published applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[run as]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[run as administrator]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pburch.com/blog/?p=212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re in the middle of checking out App-V from Microsoft&#8217;s MDOP.  At the moment, the deployment is limited to IT (and a fraction of IT at that).  We&#8217;ve already figured out a lot of cool things about it, but we&#8217;ve also run across a few annoying things.  In any case, I&#8217;ve run across something those [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re in the middle of checking out App-V from Microsoft&#8217;s <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/enterprise/technologies/mdop.aspx">MDOP</a>.  At the moment, the deployment is limited to IT (and a fraction of IT at that).  We&#8217;ve already figured out a lot of cool things about it, but we&#8217;ve also run across a few annoying things.  In any case, I&#8217;ve run across something those testing might want to keep in mind.  I wouldn&#8217;t call it a bug &#8211; the design is probably purposeful &#8211; but it&#8217;s something to be aware of.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pburch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/appvconsolerefresh.png"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-213" style="margin-left: 3px; margin-right: 3px;" title="appvconsolerefresh" src="http://www.pburch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/appvconsolerefresh-300x192.png" alt="appvconsolerefresh" width="300" height="192" /></a>Generally, the App-V Client refreshes the applications published to a user at log on.  This, of course, means valuable seconds/minutes are wasted waiting for the machine to log off and back on.  So, of course, there is a way to manually refresh the published applications via the App-V Client Console.</p>
<p>As any good administrator does (yeah, right), they do not set themselves as a local administrator for the machine they are using.  In order to access some of the &#8220;administrative-y&#8221; features of the App-V Client Console (such as the option to delete an application from the client), one must &#8220;Run as Administrator&#8221; &#8211; assuming they aren&#8217;t a local administrator.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the kicker: if you&#8217;ve opened the console as an administrator (using &#8220;Run as&#8230;&#8221;) and refresh the published applications, you&#8217;ll be updating it based on the user&#8217;s credentials you&#8217;ve provided.  If you&#8217;re running the console under the logged in user&#8217;s credentials, you&#8217;ll be updating the applications based on the applications published to that user.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll admit this does sound like an obvious conclusion, but for those of us who choose not to be local administrators it seems a bit confusing.  Just remember: the console updates based on user &#8211; not machine (because the applications are published based on a user and not a computer account).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pburch.com/blog/2009/06/15/refreshing-app-v-publishing-server/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
