<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tales from the Datacenter &#187; IBM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pburch.com/blog/category/ibm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pburch.com/blog</link>
	<description>Tales from the Datacenter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:51:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Best Practice: Cabling an EXP810 to a DS4700</title>
		<link>http://www.pburch.com/blog/2009/08/04/best-practice-cabling-an-exp810-to-a-ds4700/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pburch.com/blog/2009/08/04/best-practice-cabling-an-exp810-to-a-ds4700/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cabling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ds4700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exp810]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hba]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pburch.com/blog/2009/08/04/best-practice-cabling-an-exp810-to-a-ds4700/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We’ve been expanding our storage capacity here at work in the recent weeks.&#160; As such, cabling all of these IBM DS4700s and their associated EXP810s (full of glorious fiber channel and SATA drives) became a task. The question has always been how best to cable the fiber that keeps all this stuff working properly.&#160; You [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We’ve been expanding our storage capacity here at work in the recent weeks.&#160; As such, cabling all of these IBM DS4700s and their associated EXP810s (full of glorious fiber channel and SATA drives) became a task.</p>
<p>The question has always been how best to cable the fiber that keeps all this stuff working properly.&#160; You see, each DS4700 (the controlling enclosure) has two fiber controllers, each with two HBAs for connecting the EXP810 expansion enclosures.&#160; Well, we came across an IBM document that details exactly how they recommend cabling – and <a href="http://www.pburch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Cabling-IBM-DS4700-and-EXP810.ppt">here it is</a>.&#160; And here is the recommendation for a DS4700 with its maximum number (six) of expansion EXP810s (click for a larger view):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pburch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/ds4700exp810cable1.png"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; display: block; float: none; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; margin-left: auto; border-left-width: 0px; margin-right: auto" title="ds4700exp810cable" border="0" alt="ds4700exp810cable" src="http://www.pburch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/ds4700exp810cable_thumb1.png" width="209" height="240" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pburch.com/blog/2009/08/04/best-practice-cabling-an-exp810-to-a-ds4700/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microcode Levels</title>
		<link>http://www.pburch.com/blog/2009/02/10/microcode-levels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pburch.com/blog/2009/02/10/microcode-levels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 02:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microcode level]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pburch.com/blog/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was configuring our twelfth virtual host this afternoon and ran across a weird issue.  You see, we buy IBM Blade servers that go through integration, which means someone else configures the hardware for us.  Unfortunately, I don&#8217;t think they turn the hardware on and check things.  Case in point: we had Blades with processors [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was configuring our twelfth virtual host this afternoon and ran across a weird issue.  You see, we buy IBM Blade servers that go through integration, which means someone else configures the hardware for us.  Unfortunately, I don&#8217;t think they turn the hardware on and check things.  Case in point: we had Blades with processors running two different microcode levels (think firmware for a processor).</p>
<p>Little did I know anything was wrong when I got a big fat blue STOP error.  MULTIPROCESSOR_CONFIGURATION_NOT_SUPPORTED was staring me in the face.</p>
<p>Remember, check your microcode levels if you see STOP 0x0000003E.  It could save your life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pburch.com/blog/2009/02/10/microcode-levels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Management Ports Gone Wild</title>
		<link>http://www.pburch.com/blog/2008/06/27/management-ports-gone-wild/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pburch.com/blog/2008/06/27/management-ports-gone-wild/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management port]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pburch.com/blog/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, I learned a very important lesson.  That lesson was that management ports on IBM xSeries server do not provide network connectivity (at least not by default anyway).  That&#8217;s right.  Huge news flash, right? Actually, the lesson was to have the technician on the other end of the phone make sure they aren&#8217;t plugging into [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, I learned a very important lesson.  That lesson was that management ports on IBM xSeries server do not provide network connectivity (at least not by default anyway).  That&#8217;s right.  Huge news flash, right?</p>
<p>Actually, the lesson was to have the technician on the other end of the phone make sure they aren&#8217;t plugging into the management port.  Now, don&#8217;t take that the wrong way.  He didn&#8217;t know any better than I and merely plugged the patch cable into the only RJ-45 port he could see.</p>
<p>So, as a reminder to myself to check the management port, I blog.  Let that be a lesson to you.  Then again, maybe we should ask ourselves what prompted the network connection to drop in the first place?  I&#8217;ve already opened a ticket with IBM, because we thought the network port was dead.  To that end, I&#8217;ll run DSA on Monday and see if IBM&#8217;s &#8220;Remote Technical Support in Atlanta, Georgia&#8221; can tell me anything about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pburch.com/blog/2008/06/27/management-ports-gone-wild/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
